Juries: A Peaceful Means of Conflict Resolution?

Juries: I just want to make one point perfectly clear—well,

  • AIR MAX 2016
  • as clear as I can make it anyway.

    In a voluntary society,

  • there would be absolutely no compulsion to even use a jury: disputants would be free to choose whatever means of resolution they mutually agreed to use. Dueling, as well as casting of chicken bones, Nike Air Huarache Pas Cher might be mutually acceptable to some;

    To presume any degree of force or compulsion because people choose to engage the services of a group of people to resolve a dispute displays a lack of understanding of a voluntary society;

    Early juries were not a response to the state, government, or religion, but, Air Max 87 as far as I have been able to determine from much research, a response to a need for a mutually-agreeable way to settle disputes.

    Social groups who first used third parties to settle disputes were agreeing to give up “going to war” as a way to settle a dispute. Robert Griffin III Baylor Jerseys By agreeing to third parties’ decisions, Matt Holliday Jersey violence was often avoided,

  • Memphis Grizzlies
  • and vendettas and ambushes, Doug Baldwin Seattle Seahawks Jersey with their resultant continuation of the hostilities,

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>